![]() The traditional way: Just eyeball the design - a lot. ![]() How do you find these problems? Here are some ways: Just as devastating, and harder to detect, can be a gap in the design when something is supposed to be there but isn’t. ![]() One of the most obvious problems within a design is when two parts of the design conflict with each other (called a "clash”), like when the HVAC and electrical systems are routed through the same space. It’s important to de-risk these newer technologies and put them into practical use. In these situations, new technologies, such as advanced BIM, AR/VR, robotics and off-site construction, may feel risky. However, expertise is uneven, there are few standards, and sometimes it is unclear who should lead and if the client will pay the bill even if the benefit is obvious. The best approach is a technology strategy that is workable for all parties. The result is expensive change orders, conflict and potentially litigation. For big projects, this is impossible because it requires perfect knowledge of current and future conditions. The traditional handoff between architects, engineers and builders pressures the architect to have the first draft complete and correct. There are dozens of examples of these shifts, ranging from increasing use of design-build contracts to reuse of standard design components to factoring stakeholder and sustainability requirements into every element of the work. This is being driven by increasing client demands, more complex designs and competitive pressures. The construction industry is highly varied, but many segments are looking toward new technologies to improve productivity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |